Energy Zones are emerging as a proactive statewide planning strategy to identify areas well suited for future energy development. They also create an opportunity to improve how communities participate in planning and how tangible benefits from new infrastructure reach host communities. Today, generation and grid development often proceeds project by project. Communities and local governments may face repeated, uncoordinated engagement from multiple developers, while community benefits are negotiated separately for each project. This can increase demands on communities, push local input later in the planning process, and produce fragmented engagement and benefit outcomes. Energy Zone planning can move key questions earlier. By engaging communities, community-based and environmental justice organizations, and local and Tribal governments during zone design, states can surface local priorities and land-use considerations, establish clearer implementation expectations, and define community benefit frameworks before individual projects arrive.
The brief “Built-In Benefits: Designing State-Led Energy Zones with Communities” published by RMI examines three core design questions:
-Who participates in Energy Zone planning and what roles can different stakeholders play?
-When and how can stakeholder input influence designation criteria, maps, implementation, and project development?
-How can community benefits be calculated, structured, governed, and allocated?
The brief also examines practical approaches to benefit design. A zone-level framework can establish baseline expectations for contribution levels, eligible benefit structures, governance, and allocation while preserving defined areas for project-specific variation. It shows how states can pressure-test whether standardized contributions will produce material value and compares common mechanisms such as PILOTs, host community agreements, community benefits agreements, direct payments, and aggregated funds.
Access the brief here